Saturday, April 29, 2006

How can you take seriously a man named like a cartoon character?

One quick thought watching the draft so far: Can someone please tell Trey Wingo the volume on my TV has been turned up enough, I don't need any help hearing.

I guess I just haven't been watching ESPN a lot recently (this whole reading thing gets in the way sometimes), but I've just been struck at how often Wingo yells and then tells a horrible joke. Just now he was ripping on Santonio Holmes for yawning. Is this the best we can do? There has to be some package or highlights or analysis or some intelligent debate available. Just let Jaws and Merril Hodge talk for awhile. I think I'd rather watch those two swap soup recipes than hear Trey Wingo say anything.

Maybe 17 hours is too much.

Reasons I'm still watching:
  1. No. 38. Hoping for a LB.
  2. Trades. The Steelers and Giants just made a swap. I love this stuff.
  3. Kellen Clemens. I know he may be on the board till the end of the day so I may not stay tuned for 8 hours just to see where he goes, but it's defintely my first check when I come back. I am Oregon. Quack.
  4. Watching everyone try to talk over the crowd. Kolber trying to hear Ngata from Vegas was priceless.
  5. Seeing when they pull out the 2007 Draft board for the first time. My money's on pick 92.

The Glorious Draft...

Maybe 17 hours is too much. But the NFL Draft is the only day besides Christmas that I voluntarily get up before 10 a.m.

I had hopes the Raiders could get an impact player. Vince Young, A.J. Hawk and Matt Leinart had all been projected to go at the 7th pick in various mocks. But a mock draft is more like a horrorscope then a true projection: Anything it gets right is more luck then anything.

And true to form the Raiders ended up with safety Michael Huff from Ohio State. This is one of those picks that I'm not upset with but not excited for. The film I've seen isn't great. He doesn't look over-powering or game changing.

But everyone thinks he will be a good pro. He may not be Ronnie Lott, but he isn't Gibson, so take the good with the bad.

But I can't help but wonder if the Titans had taken Leinart if Young slides to seven. It seemed the Raiders liked Young but weren't ready to pay that much for Leinart or Cutler. As much as I've been skeptical on Young's pro prospects, he seems much more intriguing than Huff.

And maybe if the Raiders win the coin toss with the Niners and get the sixth pick they could swing a trade with the Packers. Without the Niners sitting there to pick-off Vernon Davis, who the Packers were interested in, maybe the Raiders can throw enough in to make up the difference between Davis and Hawk on their board.

But the secondary needed help, even if need picks aren't very exciting.

Labels:

Monday, April 24, 2006

Zero My Hero

Zero.

That's how many walks Matt Cain had tonight against the Mets. Over seven innings he threw 97 pitches, 67 for strikes, giving up two runs, five hits and striking out three. But even more than seeing the perfect game till the sixth, the zero walks are what make me happiest. He hasn't been having big problems with control, but a 4.5 BB/9 isn't great. And it's always good to see a young pitcher pitch deep into a game and not give away a bunch of free outs.

This was be far his best game this season. His longest outing, giving up fewer runs, hits and walks. It was also the first start this year he hasn't given up a home run. In fact, he didn't give up one extra-base hit. The pick-off errors are coachable. I'm just really excited to watch this guy develop.

Labels: ,

Friday, April 21, 2006

And the Wait Continues...

Maybe I should wait until tonight's game is actually over (it's currently 4-2 Rockies in the 5th), but I wanted to chime in on Bonds' lack of success now for a reason.

Simming a 2206 season on OOTP, I noticed my cyber-Bonds was struggling just like our real one, just with a more likeable personality (it is my game). Now my fake Bonds is rated just like a 2004 Bonds, with off the chart power numbers and patience. But this Bonds was hitting .164 on May 1st.
But I did notice he had hit one homerun. It came April 29th against the D-Backs. So now that is my prediction. April 29. Real Bonds, real flesh and blood and horse testoterone Bonds will hit his first home run. Science has already proven it and I will now stop worrying.

And despite Bonds' struggles (real one, no more talk of the pixel one), he is still has a .521 OBP. Even if the power doesn't come, and it probably wont, you have to expect a hitter like him can at least hit .270. At this point I talk about how only if he's healthy, etc...But not having been able to see Bonds swing recently, I can't tell how much he's really reaching. Reports are he's a shaddow, a shell of his former self. But I still think that he could hit .270 with one arm if he had to; his eye and his sense of the plate is just that good.

We'll see if all those reports of him being capable of hitting .400 if he wanted too were true. I suspect he if decides he can't get the power anymore he'll start taking those doubles and walks, hit 15-20 homeruns and still, if not strike fear into pitchers, at least annoy the hell out of them.

Labels: ,

Monday, April 10, 2006

WIn Shares by Transaction

I've just started messing around with something I think can be a really good tool to evaluate Gm tendicies. One of the big crticisms of Sabean has been his reliance on older talent and the Giants' inability to develop talent, mostly hitters. While looking at the makeup of the team this year I was struck at how many players were aquired through free agency and I compared that to the A's roster.

And though the Giants obviously had more free agents and fewer developed players, I found that the straight numbers of free agents vs. drafted players hid the true significance of the rosters. It doesn't matter that the Giants' have six drafted players on the roster at the start of 2006 as much as how much those six will contribute to the team this year. In fact, in 2005 the Giants and A's had similar numbers of players that the club had originally drafted play in the majors. The difference is Eric Chavez and Rich Harden against Lance Niekro and Noah Lowry.

So I listed every player to contribute a win share (According to hardballtimes.com) to either the Giants or A's in 2005 and found what transaction contributed the most to each team's victories. This is still a rough way to to look at this; a lot of players had zero (only 32 of the 50 players who spent some time with the Giants, and 30 of 41 players with the A's). I may try this again using Bill James' formula, but I'll throw this out there for now and see how it goes.

Here's the results:
San Francisco

Oakland

Type WS WS %
Type WS WS %
Draft 52 23%
Draft 117 46%
FA 129 58%
FA 14 6%
Trade 37 17%
Trade 123 50%
WA 9 4%
WA 11 5%

The differences between drafted players and free agents I expected, but look at the difference between the trade numbers. This drives home the bad run of trades Sabean has been stuck in. Most of the trade WS belonged to Randy Winn, J.T. Snow and Jason Schmidt, who's off year certainly didn't help. Meanwhile, Danny Haren, Jason Kendal, Mark Ellis and Mark Kotsay all but up decent numbers in Oakland.

This is a little toy I hope to expand. The more numbers to compare thes to the easier to put it all in perspective.

Labels:

Lost in the wilds of Oregon

This weekend was one of the lone bones tossed to an out-of-town baseball fan: The Braves Series. Besides the hit-or-miss ESPN broadcast, The Braves Series is one of the few times for me to actually see the Giants. I do have to listen to the Braves announcers and hear lots of stories about Jeff Francouer, but it's better than nothing.

Unfortunately, they played a few day games and I was unable to see more than a few innings. Luckily, one of them was the 2nd on Saturday, when they scored five runs, including a bases-clearing triple by Vizquel. Here's hoping for some more national games. SC highlights can only do so much.

Labels:

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Something more important than baseball

I first started thinking about proposing in the summer of 2005. The fact that we were coming up on our five-year anniversary first made me start seriously thinking about it, beyond both of our assumption that it would happen eventually.

My first date was our anniversary itself, Nov. 5. We have been looking at rings ever since we started dating. We go up to random jewelry stores, stare at the rings and I have to pick the one she’ll like best. So I knew she wanted a filigreed, white gold ring that sparkled a lot. We had looked at a place in Lake Oswego that had a lot of old-fashioned rings and I originally set my sights on them.

But I never got one from them. In September, while walking through the mall she works at, we stopped at a Helzberg and bought a ring. We had no plan to buy a wedding ring at that point. I hadn’t even proposed. But she saw the one perfect one, the one-that-could-never-be-beat. So we applied for credit and reserved ourselves a ring. We had three months to pick it up or return it, with the assumption that I would come under the cover of darkness and then surprise her.

While we were getting the credit, one of the saleswomen pulled me aside and asked me, “Do you have a date you plan to give it to her?” And I did. But by this time it had moved, from Nov. 5 to sometime in December. Why December? Not because of Jesus, not because of crass commercialism. But Because in August we found out that we were going to Paris.

So know I had a ring, a date and a willing proposer, and I assumed a willing proposee. But it was only a few weeks until we decided that we had acted a little too hastily and decided to return the ring. We figured if it was still there when we were ready it would be a sign.

So I was back to finding a ring myself. Unfortunately, many factors contributed to my eventual downfall. I decided that taking 18 credits would be a good thing to do while I started working at the school newspaper. I was at the paper around 30 hours a week while trying not to fail my classes. I was mentally and physically exhausted; though Nicole’s support made me sure I wanted to marry her, so all around a good decision for us all. At Thanksgiving my Mom, sensing things, hinted with an expanded Oxford Dictionary that THEY MAKE THOSE claddagh RINGS YOU TOO LIKE WITH DIAMONDS! But I wasn’t really paying attention.

So the week before we left for Paris, the week before Christmas as well, I spring on her that I’m thinking of proposing gin Paris and that I don’t know what to do for a ring. We talk about it and decide that this may be too late and there’s no reason to rush it just so I can do it in Paris. It’s too soon and a big cliché, and how could I enjoy a trip with a $2,000 diamond ring in my luggage and on the streets of Paris? Only an idiot would do it in Paris.

But then, divine inspiration. My Mom remembered that we have a lot of my Grandma Helen’s old costume jewelry from when she died. It would be sentimental, but if I lost it, it wouldn’t be a devastating loss. She got them out to see if there was one that would work, and I found a filigreed ring with an opal, Nicole’s birthstone. It was exactly what I was looking for (except it was gold and, as it turned out, my Grandma Helen had big fingers).

With all of this set up I set on my next task: Asking her father. She and her dad, Lonnie, had talked about whether or not I needed permission before asking her, and since he had never asked he didn’t see it as fair to make me, though it did seem the right way to do it. I emailed him, vaguely asking to talk about something for Nicole. It’s Christmas-time, it could be anything. Apparently I wasn’t that hard to read. He sent the email to Nicole’s Mom. He also sent it to Nicole’s sister, who would be accompanying us on our trip. Technically we were accompanying her, since it was a tour group sponsored by one of her art teachers. She is also incapable of keeping anything to herself, and told every man, woman, child, animal, vegetable, mineral, fruit, mythical creatures, figments of her imagination and any other piece of matter or mental construct she could find. This included everyone she worked with and everyone on our tour group once we got to Paris. But I digress…

I ended up meeting him for Lunch at Athens, a burger joint in Dublin. After awkwardly eating for about 15 minutes I finally asked, and was not disappointed. I hadn’t expected him to say no, but I’m also too superstitious to assume anything. Besides you know what happens when you assume. I forget how it goes, but it has something to do with a donkey.

So I packed. I rigged a pack of floss James Bond-style to hold the ring, so it would fit around the middle and you could still get floss out of it, so I could keep the ring nearby without anyone getting suspicious. One of the coolest things I have ever done, and now it was on. Except for the fact I knew nothing about Paris and had not a clue where or when to propose. I had talked to one of my editors who had been to Paris, and he suggested a park by Notre Dame as the sun was setting, so that was my only idea. I hoped something would just come to me, like the ring.

I realize that was a lot, so let me explain quickly. No, there is too much: let me sum up. We are in Paris from Dec. 27 to Jan. 5, and I have to find a way to propose, in a city I have never seen and surrounded by people who can’t speak English. Let’s continue.

I quickly realized New Year’s Eve would be my best bet. Our tour guide, a crazy Danish/English/French/chain smoker/alcoholic and incredibly knowledgeable woman, used to live in the Montmartre district in Paris and knew of a good pizza place and a hill where you could see the city and the fireworks on New Year’s Eve. She made it sound like the city did some kind of big firework thing and everyone climbed the hill up to this church, the Sacre Coeur, to see it. So we went out to the pizza place, which seated 15, tops, and were told we had to wait. But the owner took us across the street to a bar and bought our first round (there was around eight of us), and a creepy 40-something French guy hit on Nicole’s sister. Good time had by all.

After we tired of that we checked in on the pizza place and ended up standing outside waiting. Somehow me and Nicole got into a little fight (I can’t remember what it was about now, I’m not sure I knew then), but it subsided and we went in to eat. It was good, and after we went looking for another bar as some of our companions were in desperate need of moe-HE-toes. We found a suitable place, and they were served what looked like lawnmower clippings in vodka, and which I am told tasted that way as well.

As it got closer to midnight we started making our trip to the hill. The walk up is around a thousand steps (we stopped counting after a while), but there is also a nice little tram, of which a third of the population of the city was standing in line for. So we took the stairs. But around 20 steps from the top Nicole was done, and we found a spot on a dirt path off the staircase and claimed a spot. I ran up after everyone else then and told them where we were, and to grab us when they left.

So we sit and watch the people run around us and try not to lose feeling in our hands and feet, waiting for the New Year. From where we were we could see the Eiffel Tower on our right and most of the city. There was one tree between us and the Tower, but being December it wasn’t that big a deal. So we waited for our two signs of the New Year; a sparkling tower and a big fireworks display.

The crowd noise got bigger and bigger the longer we waited, but I thought that was just because more people were showing up. I had in my mind this perfect scene a huge countdown, fireworks going off in the sky around us, the sparkling tower and then me getting down on one knee. But suddenly the tower started sparkling. No fireworks, no countdown. Apparently the city doesn’t do fireworks and the French can’t count. But what they do is shoot bottle rockets at the crowd. Lovely. It took us a few minutes to realize that it was now actually 2006. At that point I grabbed the ring out of my pocket and while we were hugging I whispered in her ear, “Nicole…”

I paused just a little longer than I wanted to because the ring was stuck on my finger.

This gave her time to say “Yesssss?”

I really don’t remember clearly a lot of what happened next. I have one picture in my mind of looking up at her but I don’t remember clearly her saying yes. I was back up quickly and I picked her up as well as I could standing in mud, and we did that for I can’t remember how long, but I’m still sad we stopped. Just holding her at that moment is at this point the best memory I have of that night and probably my life.

There is a lot more to the story. We never met up with everyone else, including Nicole’s sister. We missed the last train and walked for around an hour through Paris until we found a cab. We stayed up talking (with me telling her most of this story) in a stairwell in our hotel.

And I have no ending. It hasn’t happened yet.

Monday, April 03, 2006

Something scarry, something not

I have this theory that Barry Zito and Shawn Estes are really the same pitcher. Zito's non-moving-curveball-face is the same one Estes made when he started losing his. Watching Zito tonight really drove it home. So I went to baseball-reference.com to check if Estes showed up on Zito's similar pitcher list. Alas it was not to be so, but looking around Estes similar list I found one other player of note. Here's mystery player's similar list:
  1. Allan Anderson (985)
  2. Donovan Osborne (982)
  3. Al McBean (980)
  4. Scott McGregor (977)
  5. Tommy Greene (977)
  6. Shawn Estes (975)
  7. Tom Zachary (974)
  8. Jack Morris (974)
  9. Ross Baumgarten (974)
  10. Gustavo Chacin (972)
Numbers 6 and 8 are what jump out at me. Could Noah Lowry be the next Estes. God, I hope not.

Labels:

A reason to live for a few more years

Today is Part II of my look at the Giants new starting rotation. I’ve already compared Matt Morris and Brett Tomko, and Jamey Wright and Kirk Rueter. All that’s left is Matt Cain and Jerome Williams.

Matt Cain: Through the Ainsworths, Fopperts, Boofs and Bumps, Matt Cain may be the closes the Giants have come to actually developing a true front line starter (Noah Lowry not withstanding). Already a few pundits are picking him as a ROY candidate, and with good reason. In 7 starts last year he had a 0.93 WHIP and a 2.33 ERA. But during his 46.1 IP for the Giants, his K/9 rate was cut almost in half from his minor league totals, and his H/9 dropped around 2.5. Obviously he’s not going to keep up last years rate (sample size sample size), but people are still predicting good things. Since I have little experience with MLE I’ll stick with other people’s guesses. The Bill James Handbook puts him down for 186 IP with a 3.16 ERA, but ZiPS says a 4.65 ERA over 178 IP. Looking at these, I’m guessing an ERA around 4.00 and a WHIP around 1.40. A good year, but nothing spectacular.

Jerome Williams: The puka shells, the age, the rush of actually developing a real prospect. The good times of 2003. But Williams couldn’t keep it up, and his WHIP rose in 2004 and 2005, earning him a trip to Chicago in one of the worst trades in the history of professional sports. Trust me, I’ve researched this and giving hard proof would only make it hurt more. In his 18 starts with the Cubs he had a 3.91 ERA and a 109 ERA+. His 1.349 WHIP was still higher than 2003 and 2004, but at only 24, he can definitely improve.

Decision: I don’t know anyone that would trade Cain for Williams right now. Cain is one of the elite prospects in the game, and Williams still has a lot of questions. Though Williams could have a better 2006, by 2007 Cain should be the better pitcher and hopefully one of the bright spots on a team that should be pretty bad.

Labels: ,

Watching Two Geriatrics Bludgeon Each Other to Death with Pillows

Really, a contest between Kirk Rueter and Jamey Wright is not a battle for the ages. But onec again I'm back with Part II of my look at the Giants three new starting pitchers, compared with the man who had his spot on opening day last year. Yesterday I looked at Matt Morris and Brett Tomko, and tomorrow I'm moving to Matt Cain and Jerome Williams.

For Tomko and Morris it was a pretty straight-forward look at which one was most likely to outperform the other this year based on numbers from the last few years. In the next two cases it isn’t that easy. One, Matt Cain has very small major league sample size so a lot will be based on minor league performance, while Rueter has since retired and has no chance of outperforming Wright (except in theory!).

In this case I decided to see if Wright can give us what some form of Rueter Level Performance, based on a three-year average. I used 2003-2005 for both players. I thought about using 2002 for Rueter, but in the end I felt that since it was an above average year (117 ERA+), it would be comparing Wright against a standard no one is expecting him to reach.

Jamey Wright: It’s hard to look at Wright’s stats since he spent the last two years in the Siberia of MLB, Coors Field. He also only has 44 starts and 275.1 IP over the last three years. Still, what I’m seeing isn’t great. Of all pitchers with at least 200 IP since 2003, has the 13th worst BB/9 (4.48). Over that same time, Rueter walked 23 more batter than Wright, in 169 more innings. And taken with how much ever salt you choose, the 2006 Bill James Handbook projects he stays right around 4.5 BB/9 this year, and lists him as a high injury probability. On the positive, his K/9 isn’t bad (5.26, better than Tomko) and his HR/9 (1.01) is pretty good considering he’s been pitching at Coors.

Kirk Rueter: Woody finally decided it was time to retire to the shed, and will be depriving baseball of his crazy ears and incredibly low strikeout rates. So low that, from 2003 to 2005, only Nate Cornejo has a lower K/9 rate (and according to baseball-reference.com, Wright's worth as a human being is $5 dollars higher than Cornejo, $15 to $10. Always good to know) . Over the same time frame Rueter had a 0.76 K/BB rate, so every inning he threw he was more likely to walk a batter than strike him out. But he also gave up only 0.95 HR/9 and somehow managed to be a winning pitcher for the Giants. And we all thank him for it.

Decision: Since 2003, Wright and Rueter have had very similar WHIPs (1.61 and 1.54) and ERAs (4.97 and 4.96, eerie). If Wright can cut down on his walks a little (how many pitchers have had that said about them this off-season? I would love to see that stat) he could be a serviceable fifth starter, and at least put in a decent VRLP (Value over Rueter Level Performance). His low HR/9 and his high K/9 give him good rates for two of the three true outcomes. And as long as he keeps every ground ball on the left side and every fly ball to center, maybe everything else will fall into place. Wright definitely doesn’t have a huge upside, but considering the difference between Wright and Tomko recently has been about a walk and a half, I think he could be worth what they’re paying him. As long as he keep the Giants in a few games while giving the front four some rest, he’ll do his job, though the list of players I wouldn't mind seeing instead of Wright is pretty long. But that's another discussion...

Labels: ,

Sunday, April 02, 2006

Becasue my Bill James handbook is my best freind...

The Giants are starting the season with three new starting pitchers from this time last year, and in my own ultra-simplified mind have separated it down thusly: Morris replaces Tomko, Cain replaces Williams and Wright replaces Rueter. Today I’m looking at Morris and Tomko.

Matt Morris: Morris comes from the Cardinals after a few if not disappointing at least mediocre seasons. He has had some injury problems, but still has pitched well over the last few seasons. In the last three years he’s averaged a 101 ERA+, so he’s been at least average. And if you listen to Tony LaRussa or MLB.com, the cool air should help him out. But his velocity has been dropping, evidenced by him throwing the 4th lowest percentage of fastballs (43.7) and 5th most curveballs (23.3) in the majors last year.

Brett Tomko: This says pretty much everything I know about Brett Tomko. As much as any statistic can tell you and how much I know he’s a better pitcher than this, watching someone give up 5 runs in the first inning to the Rockies, away from Coors, makes an impression. One I haven’t been able to shake, but I’ll try to put on my objective journalist hat (I have one in my other job). Bill James says Tomko had the 4th fastest average fastball in the majors last year, and threw 401 pitches faster than 95 mph. Everyone knows he has the tools. But between calls for sports physiologists he has never been able to put it all together, once upon a time, in a land far far away, on a dark and stormy night, etc…

Decision: Maybe I’m just done with Tomko (not saying he won’t figure it out in Chavez Ravine), but I’m happy with the Morris signing, strictly from a performance standpoint. Between 2 years/$8.7 mil vs. 3 years/$27 mil, especially for pitchers over 30, you take the former. But looking at the numbers, over the last three years Morris has a better ERA+ (101 to 94), K/BB (2.79 to 1.89) and WHIP (1.25 to 1.41). He gets more strikeouts and walks fewer batters, always a plus. And Tomko has huge right/left and home/away splits, which spells inconsistency to me. I think Tomko has the bigger upside, but Morris has the best chance of actually succeeding.

Labels: ,

Something about a stone that rolls.

The Giants have officially released their opening day roster. It took eight transactions Saturday, most notably putting Armando Benitez on the DL, but we now have a 2006 San Francisco Giants. Since the end of the 2005 season the Giants have acquired eight new players: one first baseman, one outfielder, two relief pitchers, two starting pitchers and one utility player (if you can call Jose Vizcaino that). Besides the trades for Steve Finley and Steve Kline, all the other players were picked up as free agents.

But saying that the team picked up eight new players doesn’t really do justice the amount of movement the organization has done sine this time last year. Only nine of the 25 players on the 2006 opening day roster were on the 2005 opening day roster: Pitchers Jason Schmidt, Noah Lowry, Jeff Fassero and Tyler Walker, catcher Mike Matheny, infielders Ray Durham, Pedro Feliz and Omar Vizquel, and outfielders Moises Alou and Jason Ellison.

But of the 16 new players, 7 spent some time with the Giants last season. Last year Bonds was hurt on opening day (and most of the days after), players like Lance Niekro and Jeremy Accardo were called up from the minors and Randy Winn was picked up mid-year from Seattle. Still, that means almost 2/3 of the team either didn’t spend all last year either in the majors or with the Giants. But considering who the Giants started with last year, this isn’t such a bad thing. Though this will be the first season in a while without Rueter, Snow and Torrealba, it also will be without Michael Tucker, Jim Brower and Edgardo Alfonzo, so take the good with the bad.

Over the last year, the Giants have redone 3/5 of the starting rotation, exchanging Rueter, Brett Tomko and Jerome Williams for Jamey Wright, Morris and Matt Cain (I’ll be looking at this later this week). Five of the seven bullpen arms are new, but that’s with Benitez on the DL and not the 25-man roster.

The Giants have been through a lot of change this off-season, but it has built a team that at last David Pinto thinks will make it to the playoffs. Of the 25 players now suiting up for the Giants, eight started in the Giants organization, four were acquired in trades and the rest, 14 players, were free agent pickups.

Amazing to think, but it took the organization a little over 13 years to build this team. The Giants started on December 8, 1992, with the signing of Barry Bonds from the Pirates, and finished on February 7, 2006 with the signing of Todd Greene (side note: While looking this up, I found out that of the 11 Greenes or Greens who have played in the majors, none have been an all-star. Unfortunately, Kahlil Greene may break that eventually...), formerly of the Rockies. Here’s the whole time line of the 2006 San Francisco Giants:

  • December 8, 1992: Sign Barry Bonds as a free agent from the Pittsburgh Pirates.
  • February 7, 1994: Sign Pedro Feliz as an amatuer free agent.
  • June 5, 1999: Draft Jack Taschner
  • June 5, 2000: Draft Lance Niekro
  • June 5, 2000: Draft Jason Ellison
  • June 5, 2001: Draft Noah Lowry
  • June 5, 2001: Draft Scott Munter
  • July 30, 2001: Traded for Jason Schmidt of the Pittsburgh Pirates
  • June 5, 2002: Draft Matt Cain
  • December 7, 2002: Sign Ray Durham as a free agent from the Oakland Athletics
  • June 5, 2003: Sign Jeremy Accardo as an undrafted free agent
  • November 25, 2003: Sign Tyler Walker as a free agent from the Detroit Tigers
  • November 16, 2004: Sign Omar Vizquel as a free agent from the Cleveland Indians
  • December 2, 2004: Signed Armando Benitez as a free agent from the Florida Marlins
  • December 15, 2004: Signed Jeff Fassero as a free agent from the Arizona Diamondbacks
  • December 15, 2004: Signed Mike Mateny as a free agent from the St. Louis Cardinals
  • December 27, 2004: Signed Moises Alou as a free agent from the Chicago Cubs
  • July 30, 2005: Traded for Randy Winn of the Seattle Mariners
  • December 2, 2005: Signed Tim Worrel as a free agent from the Arizona Diamondbacks
  • December 5, 2005: Traded for Steve Kline of the Baltimore Orioles
  • December 8, 2005: Signed Mark Sweeney as a free agent from the San Diego Padres
  • December 13, 2005: Signed Matt Morris as a free agent from the St. Louis Cardinals
  • December 21, 2005: Traded for Steve Finely of the Los Angeles/Anahiem/California/Los Angeles Angels
  • December 23, 2005: Signed Jose Vizcaino as a free agent from the Houston Astros
  • January 17, 2006: Signed Jamey Wright as a free agent from the Colorado Rockies
  • February 7, 2006: Signed Todd Greene as a free agent from the Colorado Rockies





Labels: , , ,